liteRadar
Detects the gap and alerts the right people.
- Compares asked, said and did on every agent task
- Instant alert to the person in charge of the agent
- Daily summary to the executive in charge
Agents Integrity Platform
AI agents now change real business data. What they were asked, what they report and what they actually did can be three different things. lite catches the moment they stop matching, and tells the person in charge.
The agent says "done". Nothing changed in the system.
Data changed that the agent never reported.
The agent did more than it was asked, or something else.
No attack. No stolen password. No policy broken. The agent was logged in, authorized and well-behaved, and it still changed the wrong data.
While issuing a refund, a support agent also upgrades customer 4471 to VIP. Nobody asked for it. The agent never reported it.
Allowed to write here? Yes, it has permission.
An attack or malicious prompt? No.
Did sensitive data leak out? No.
Did the agent report success? Yes, "done".
Does what changed match what was asked and said? No.
lite is the last line of defense. It catches what every other layer lets through, before it becomes a painful data problem.
lite lines up the three records of every agent task. When they don't match, the owner hears within minutes.
Customer 4471 was upgraded to VIP during a refund. Never asked for, never reported.
A daily summary to the CIO: how many agent actions were checked, how many matched, and which agents keep drifting. Nobody has to go looking.
Alerts go to Slack, Teams or email.
When they match, lite stays quiet. When they don't, a human knows within minutes.
Taken from the first step of the agent's trace, or the ticket system.
ticket #5120: "refund order 8821 for customer 4471"
One extra export line pointing at lite.
refund(8821, 49.90) → "Done, refund issued"
A read-only API key or database role.
order 8821 → refunded
cust 4471: standard → VIP
Built to read from the stack you already run
lite never needs write rights to watch your agents.
So every change traces back to the agent that made it.
No specific vendor required.
If an agent gets each step right 99% of the time, a 50-step task comes out fully right only about 60% of the time. That's simple math, not a survey.
Agents are taking on longer tasks, with more steps and fewer human checkpoints. A quarter of them can already start other agents.
Assumes independent steps: chance = accuracysteps.
of organizations had a confirmed or suspected AI-agent incident in the last year.
of an organization's AI agents are actively monitored or secured, on average.
of deployed agents can already create and task other agents.
Source: Gravitee, State of AI Agent Security 2026, a survey of 900+ executives and practitioners, February 2026.
One platform in three modules. Each one reuses the data Radar already collects.
Detects the gap and alerts the right people.
Rolls back the wrong change.
Retrains the agent not to repeat it.
Each undo uses a temporary, narrow permission and is logged as evidence.
Each agent's gap rate falls over time, and lite shows the trend to the executive.
Former CIO and COO.
HP, LSports, Papaya GlobalFormer VP Engineering.
$15B SaaS & AI companyFormer VP R&D.
Seed-stage cyber startupWe are the buyer we sell to.
We're working with a small group of companies that already run AI agents against production data. If that's you, we'd like to talk.
Investors, choose "Investor" in the form.