Agents Integrity Platform

lite is the detective for your AI agents.

AI agents now change real business data. What they were asked, what they report and what they actually did can be three different things. lite catches the moment they stop matching, and tells the person in charge.

SAID ≠ DID

Silent failure

The agent says "done". Nothing changed in the system.

DID ≠ SAID

Unclaimed change

Data changed that the agent never reported.

DID ≠ ASKED

Drift

The agent did more than it was asked, or something else.

Why security tools miss it

The agent had permission.

No attack. No stolen password. No policy broken. The agent was logged in, authorized and well-behaved, and it still changed the wrong data.

For example

While issuing a refund, a support agent also upgrades customer 4471 to VIP. Nobody asked for it. The agent never reported it.

One change, travelling through your stackcust 4471 → VIP

Identity & access

Allowed to write here? Yes, it has permission.

PASSES

Agent security & guardrails

An attack or malicious prompt? No.

PASSES

Data security & DLP

Did sensitive data leak out? No.

PASSES

Observability & traces

Did the agent report success? Yes, "done".

PASSES

lite

Does what changed match what was asked and said? No.

CAUGHT

lite is the last line of defense. It catches what every other layer lets through, before it becomes a painful data problem.

lite Radar

Watch lite catch it.

lite lines up the three records of every agent task. When they don't match, the owner hears within minutes.

lite Radar Live actions checked today 1,842
ASKED Zendesk
ticket #5120 · 14:01"Refund order 8821 for customer 4471"✓
SAID agent trace
support-bot-07 · tool callrefund(8821, 49.90)✓
support-bot-07 · final answer"Done, refund issued"✓
DID Stripe · Salesforce
stripe · refundsorder 8821 → refunded 49.90✓
salesforce · field historycust 4471 tier: standard → VIPUnclaimed change. Never asked, never reported.
liteto the agent's owner · now
Gap detected: support-bot-07

Customer 4471 was upgraded to VIP during a refund. Never asked for, never reported.

View evidenceRoll backMark as expected
Gap found in task #5120: unclaimed change

The executive sees the pattern every morning.

A daily summary to the CIO: how many agent actions were checked, how many matched, and which agents keep drifting. Nobody has to go looking.

Alerts go to Slack, Teams or email.

Agent integrity · yesterdayTo: CIO · 07:00
1,842agent actions checked
99.3%asked = said = did
13gaps found
Silent failures9
Unclaimed changes3
Drift1
Most gaps: support-bot-07 (6). 11 of 13 resolved.Illustrative numbers
How it works

Three records of every agent task. One answer.

When they match, lite stays quiet. When they don't, a human knows within minutes.

ASKED the task

Taken from the first step of the agent's trace, or the ticket system.

Tickets
Zendesk, Jira, ServiceNow
Prompts
Chat, Slack, Teams
Triggers
Workflow events, schedules, another agent
ticket #5120:
"refund order 8821
 for customer 4471"
SAID the report

One extra export line pointing at lite.

Agent traces
OpenTelemetry from LangChain, OpenAI and Claude agent SDKs, CrewAI
Existing tools
Langfuse, LangSmith, Datadog
Or
lite's MCP gateway, vendor agent logs
refund(8821, 49.90)
→ "Done, refund issued"
DID the change

A read-only API key or database role.

Apps
Audit logs and field history in Salesforce, Zendesk, Stripe, Workday
Databases
Change feeds in Postgres, Snowflake
Cloud
CloudTrail, or a read-back query
order 8821 → refunded
cust 4471: standard → VIP
Matched by agent identity+ task ID+ record IDs+ time window= one case to compare

Built to read from the stack you already run

ZendeskJiraServiceNowSlackMicrosoft TeamsOpenTelemetryLangChainOpenAI Agents SDKClaude Agent SDKCrewAILangfuseLangSmithDatadogSalesforceStripeWorkdayPostgresSnowflakeAWS CloudTrail

Read-only access

lite never needs write rights to watch your agents.

One identity per agent

So every change traces back to the agent that made it.

Any framework, any cloud

No specific vendor required.

Why it gets worse

Small errors add up over long tasks.

If an agent gets each step right 99% of the time, a 50-step task comes out fully right only about 60% of the time. That's simple math, not a survey.

Agents are taking on longer tasks, with more steps and fewer human checkpoints. A quarter of them can already start other agents.

60.5%chance the whole task is right

Assumes independent steps: chance = accuracysteps.

88%

of organizations had a confirmed or suspected AI-agent incident in the last year.

47%

of an organization's AI agents are actively monitored or secured, on average.

25%

of deployed agents can already create and task other agents.

Source: Gravitee, State of AI Agent Security 2026, a survey of 900+ executives and practitioners, February 2026.

The platform

Catch it. Fix it. Make sure it doesn't come back.

One platform in three modules. Each one reuses the data Radar already collects.

Phase 1 · Now

liteRadar

Detects the gap and alerts the right people.

  • Compares asked, said and did on every agent task
  • Instant alert to the person in charge of the agent
  • Daily summary to the executive in charge
Detective control
Phase 2 · Next

liteRewind

Rolls back the wrong change.

  • Shows exactly what changed, before and after
  • A human approves; lite reverses the change
  • Flags what can't be undone and pauses the agent
Corrective control
Phase 3 · Later

liteCoach

Retrains the agent not to repeat it.

  • Every confirmed gap becomes a lesson
  • Feeds agent instructions, rules and test cases
  • Gap rate per agent goes down over time
Preventive control
lite Rewind

Undo the wrong change, with a human in control.

ReversibleA field or status changeOne-click undo after approval
CompensableA refund or payment already sentlite proposes the reversing transaction
IrreversibleAn email sent, data sharedEscalate and pause the agent

Each undo uses a temporary, narrow permission and is logged as evidence.

lite Coach

Turn every confirmed gap into a lesson.

  • Agent instructionsClearer rules, like "never change customer tier during a refund"
  • Guardrail rulesBlock the pattern before it runs again
  • Test casesReplay the case before every new agent version
  • Training dataFine-tuning examples, where you own the model

Each agent's gap rate falls over time, and lite shows the trend to the executive.

Founding team

20+ years each running data, IT, security and AI at scale.

IPCEO

Itzik Polad

Former CIO and COO.

HP, LSports, Papaya Global
COO

In stealth

Former VP Engineering.

$15B SaaS & AI company
CTO

In stealth

Former VP R&D.

Seed-stage cyber startup

We are the buyer we sell to.

Design partners

Put your agents in the light.

We're working with a small group of companies that already run AI agents against production data. If that's you, we'd like to talk.

Investors, choose "Investor" in the form.

I'm reaching out as
We reply within one business day.